tax ENSight | 27 January 2016

unilateral extension of prescription in certain specific tax matters

by Carmen Gers and Chris de Bruyn

Section 99 of the Tax Administration Act, 28 of 2011 (“Tax Admin Act”), which regulates prescription in relation to tax assessments, provides that a three-year prescription period applies where the South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) has had a previous opportunity to assess a taxpayer (e.g. income tax) and a five-year prescription period applies in the case of self-assessment (e.g. value added tax and employees’ tax).

In an ENSafrica article dated 19 August 2015, we addressed the proposed unilateral extension of prescription by SARS as was provided for in the draft Tax Administration Laws Amendment Bill (“Draft Bill”), a copy of which can be found here

In terms of the Draft Bill, National Treasury proposed that the prescription period may be unilaterally extended by SARS, before the expiry of the existing prescription period if, inter alia, an audit or investigation relates to a complex matter such as the application of the general anti-avoidance provisions (“GAAR”) under a tax Act, an audit or investigation under section 31 of the Income Tax Act, 58 of 1962 (“Income Tax Act”) (dealing with transfer pricing), or a matter of analogous complexity. In such events, it was proposed that the period may be extended for a period of up to three years. 

In response to an invitation by National Treasury and SARS’ for public comments on the Draft Bill prior to its formal introduction in Parliament, ENSafrica submitted representations on, inter alia, the proposal to amend section 99 of the Tax Admin Act. Our submissions included that the reference to a “matter of analogous complexity” is a subjective matter of opinion and is excessively broad. 

The Standing Committee on Finance (“SCOF”) released a final response document on the Draft Bill on 4 December 2015 addressing the comments received and providing responses on these comments. The SCOF accepted the abovementioned comment and indicated that the reference to “complex matters” will be withdrawn and replaced with a reference to the application of certain specific circumstances.

On 8 January 2016, the Tax Administration Laws Amendment Act, 23 of 2015 (“TALAA”) was published in the Government Gazette, amending, inter alia, section 99 of the Tax Admin Act. The TALAA inserts section 99(4) to the Tax Admin Act, which provides that the Commissioner of SARS may, by prior notice of at least 60 days to the taxpayer, extend the period of prescription in section 99(1), before the expiry thereof, by three years in the case of an assessment by SARS or two years in the case of self-assessment, where an audit or investigation under chapter 5 of the Tax Admin Act relates to:

  1. the application of the doctrine of substance over form;
  2. the application of Part IIA of Chapter III of the Income Tax Act, section 73 of the Value Added Tax Act or any other general anti-avoidance provision under a tax Act;
  3. the taxation of hybrid entities or hybrid instruments; or
  4. section 31 of the Income Tax Act.

It is, therefore, imperative that taxpayers be aware that while SARS may unilaterally extend the prescription period to six years in the case of an assessment by SARS, and seven years in the case of self-assessment, (1) SARS must give a taxpayer 60 days’ notice (i.e. notice must be received at least 60 days prior to the date that the assessment would otherwise prescribe), (2) an audit or investigation must be underway and (3) the said audit or investigation must relate to the substance over form doctrine, anti-avoidance arrangements, hybrid entities or hybrid instruments, or transfer pricing matters.


Carmen Gers

tax | director
cell: +27 82 708 0523

add to Outlook contacts


No information provided herein may in any way be construed as legal advice from ENSafrica and/or any of its personnel. Professional advice must be sought from ENSafrica before any action is taken based on the information provided herein, and consent must be obtained from ENSafrica before the information provided herein is reproduced in any way. ENSafrica disclaims any responsibility for positions taken without due consultation and/or information reproduced without due consent, and no person shall have any claim of any nature whatsoever arising out of, or in connection with, the information provided herein against ENSafrica and/or any of its personnel. Any values, such as currency (and their indicators), and/or dates provided herein are indicative and for information purposes only, and ENSafrica does not warrant the correctness, completeness or accuracy of the information provided herein in any way.



Please fill in the form below to send us any queries, requests, feedback, suggestions - we'd love to hear from you:


latest news


our awards

African Legal Awards Chambers and Partners Rankings DealMakers Awards Global Competition Review 100 (GCR100) Rankings IAM Patent 1000 Rankings IFLR1000 Rankings International Tax Review (ITR) Rankings Legal 500 Rankings Managing Intellectual Property (MIP) Rankings World Trademark Review 1000 (WTR 1000) Rankings | level 2 BBBEE rating (South Africa)